Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
By Serafim Opricovic, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007
1,650 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d86a84ef098d32d89ee93dd0e812d0c763774616
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2015, methodology): “For the study and comparison of different MCDM methods we refer to [23–27].”
- An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers (2011, methodology): “[42] developed an extension of VIKOR method [43,44] for MAGDM problem with interval numbers, in which the DMs’ weights are also same.”
- Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review (2011, methodology): “The authors extended the comparison of VIKOR method with TOPSIS to other MCDM approaches, namely, Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and ELimination and Choice Expressing REality (ELECTRE), by using a numerical example and compared results of analysis [90, ”
- A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard (2009, methodology): “The Multi-criteria Optimization and Compromise Solution (called VIKOR) is a suitable tool to evaluate each alternative for each criterion function (Opricovic & Tzeng, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007; Tzeng, Lin, & Opricovic, 2005).”
- Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making (2015, methodology): “To show the difference between the VIKOR and TOPSIS methods, Tzeng et al. [26] used these two methods respectively to select a moderate fuel mode for buses in urban area of Taiwan with several types of fuels such as electricity, fuel cell (hydrogen) and methanol considered as alternative-fuel modes.”
- Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information (2013, methodology): “…method [19] [20] [21], the gray relational analysis method [22], the VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) method [23] [24] [25], the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations) method [26], and the ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant…”
- Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment (2010, methodology): “…MCDM method developed to solve multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems with conflicting and non-commensurable (different units) criteria (Opricovic & Tzeng, 2007), may provide the basis for developing supplier selection models that can effectively deal with characteristics of this…”
- Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach (2018, neutral): “Shojaei et al. (2017) and Gupta (2017) made a comparison between BWM and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) (Opricovic & Tzeng, 2007) method.”
- A Hierarchical Group Decision-Making Approach for New Product Selection in a Fuzzy Environment (2013, methodology): “The main feature of this method is to determine a compromise solution that supports the maximum group utility for the majority and a minimum of individual regret for the opponent [16,17].”
- Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020, methodology): “The common MCDA methods belonging to the American school include Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) [9–11], VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [12], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [13,14], and Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) [”
- A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment (2013, methodology): “E-mail addresses: ouyang.ping@msa.hinet.net (Y.-P. Ou Yang), ghtzeng@mail.knu.edu.tw, ghtzeng@cc.nctu.edu.tw (G.-H. Tzeng).”
- Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making (2012, methodology): “[27] S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research 178 (2007) 514– 529.”