Engagement: Where to next?

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review (2020, background): “Whilst there are ongoing conversations about the nature and composition of student engagement (e.g. Eccles, 2016), and space in the present article does not allow a lengthy consideration of the concept (see Bond & Bedenlier, 2019; Bond, Buntins, Bedenlier, Zawacki-Richter, & Kerres, 2020), it is…”
Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education (2017, background): “Although these categorizations map to commonsense aspects of doing, feeling, and thinking, Eccles (2016) has pointed out that their distinctions are rather fuzzy and overlapping.”
Student Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions (2021, background): “However, it is important to point out that there is a debate on whether these indicators should be categorized as behavioral or cognitive engagement (see Eccles, 2016).”
Self-Determination and Classroom Engagement of EFL Learners: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Self-System Model of Motivational Development (2019, background): “More research is required, however, to determine whether or not agentic engagement is distinct from other types of engagement and differentially predicts outcomes from the already established three dimensions (Eccles, 2016).”