Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions
By Frank W. Geels, Frans Berkhout, D. P. Vuuren. 2016
417 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbce1a00c878f0c02b6ff36201da0705a3ee9357
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- D. V. van Vuuren
- D. P. Vuuren
- Pete Smith
- Elmar Kriegler
- Keywan Riahi
- Shinichiro Fujimori
- R. Pietzcker
- A. Cherp
In Environmental Engineering
- Pete Smith
- D. V. van Vuuren
- D. P. Vuuren
- R. Pietzcker
- Nico Bauer
- A. Cherp
- Keywan Riahi
- Elmar Kriegler
In Global and Planetary Change
- D. P. Vuuren
- Yuan Peng
- D. V. van Vuuren
- Elmar Kriegler
- K. O’Brien
- Jean-François Mercure
- O. Geden
- Pete Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Societal Transformations in Models for Energy and Climate Policy: The Ambitious Next Step (2019, background): “The main stronghold of the bridging and iterating strategies is that they recognize the level of complexity and context specificity of societal change that would otherwise need to be simplified in models in the case of the merging strategy.(9,43,54) The bridging and iterating strategies hence allow ”
- Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation (2018, background): “5 C target has been predominantly technical, largely informed by Integrated Assessment Models, which are closely linked to techno-economic approaches, ecological modernization and rational choice models of decisionmaking [21].”
- Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives (2017, background): “Analysis of mitigation could also be enriched by building bridges to social sciences focusing on technology transformations (Geels et al., 2016).”
- The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking (2016, background): “In treating the Paris Agreement’s mitigation targets as if they were intended as a deliberate choice between different possible end states, climate researchers are stabilizing the cultural norm of consistency in climate policymaking: IAMs can indeed be seen as integral to maintaining the illusion th”
- A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and Proposed Approaches to Address These, through the Lens of BECCS (2019, background): “Efforts to link IAM analysis to the social-technical multi-level perspective have advanced beyond external calls, to co-authored position papers by leading proponents from the respective research communities [83].”