Theory and phenomenology of type I strings and M-theory

By Emilian Dudas. 2000

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The physical motivations and the basic construction rules for type I strings and M-theory compactifications are reviewed in the light of recent developments. The first part of this review contains the basic theoretical ingredients needed for building four-dimensional supersymmetric models, models with broken supersymmetry, and for computing low-energy actions and quantum corrections to these. The second part contains some phenomenological applications to brane world scenarios with low values of the string scale and large extra dimensions.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/509594c7ad682bf4cc5079d712505e777649d053

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Wafer-Level Heterogeneous Integration for MOEMS, MEMS, and NEMS (2011, methodology): “In these approaches, localized bonding with patterned intermediate bonding layers [74], 132]–[134] has been used to obtain suspended graphene membranes without the need for etching the intermediate bonding layer underneath the graphene membranes.”
Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology (2010, methodology): “At one-loop, one can derive the couplings by including Kaluza–Klein excitations to get [163]”
Issues on tadpoles and vacuum redefinitions in String Theory (2004, background): “4 The orientifold projection This section is devoted to review the orientifold projection for the Superstring Theory [13, 65, 45, 69, 66, 60, 46, 47].”
Transport phenomena in nanofluidics (2008, methodology): “Niklaus et al., 2006" have been used for wafer bonding, such as water glass !”