A Taxonomy for Privacy
By W. Ware. 1981
Subfields: Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- Zeerak Talat
- Irene Solaiman
- Su Lin Blodgett
- Dylan Baker
- Ben Williamson
- France Bélanger
- Sarah Spiekermann
- Alessandro Acquisti
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society (2023, background): “Impacts [230] and harms [59] from the loss and violation of privacy are difficult to enumerate and evaluate, such as loss of opportunity or reputational damage.”
- The Economics of Personal Data and the Economics of Privacy (2010, background): “…not be construed as a denial of the existence of other dimensions to the privacy debate, which may be more difficult to capture in economic terms (Solove (2006), for instance, distinguishes between privacy issues associated with the collection, processing, or dissemination of personal data, and…”
- The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study (2011, background): “fidentiality b tween the organization and the indi vidual occurs, the violation of trust may entitle the victim o compensation (Solove 2006).”
- Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019, background): “Diverse taxonomies of privacy have been defined in the literature [33], [34].”
- Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? (2019, background): “This is likely to lead to an increase in the number of higher skilled jobs and a reduction in jobs requiring lower qualifications (Brühl, 2015; Spath et al., 2013). Industry 4.0 will therefore have a significant impact on both the labour market and society. According to Kovács (2017b), the success o”
- Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts (2013, background): “However, recent empirical evidence has shown that while control is a major factor in forming individual’s privacy concerns, it is not identical to privacy (Dinev & Hart, 2004, 2006; Xu, 2007).”
- What Is Privacy Worth? (2013, unknown): “Researchers have correctly noted that privacy is an ambiguous, multi-faceted concept (Solove [2006]).”
- The Economics of Privacy (2016, background): “It means different things to different people (Solove, 2006).”
- Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems (2011, background): “Another taxonomy includes information collection, information processing, information dissemination, and invasion (Solove 2006).”
- Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy (2016, background): “…body of theoretical scholarship has focused on privacy as contextually defined, where privacy norms are defined and examined within a specific set of relationships, situations, or contexts (Nissenbaum 2004, 2009; Solove 2006; Martin 2012; Stutzman and Hartzog 2012; Moor 1997; Jiang et al. 2002).”
- Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance (2017, unknown): “Nobody can articulate what it means ” (Solove 2006, p. 476; for a comprehensive review of privacy literature in marketing, see also Martin and Murphy [2016]).”
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: a dynamic reference work (2003, background): “More recently a type of privacy account has been proposed in relation to new information technology, that acknowledges that there is a cluster of related moral claims (cluster accounts) underlying appeals to privacy (DeCew 1997; Solove 2006; van den Hoven 1999; Allen 2011; Nissenbaum 2004), but main”
- Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (2017, background): “Also, current research has not considered the diversity of privacy harms (Solove, 2006).”
- Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments (2015, background): “We found that physical security and safety were major concerns for some participants (N=4), and these in turn created privacy concerns: maintaining one’s home free from intrusion has long been considered a basic tenet of privacy [28].”