Pro-social behavior in a natural setting

By Bruno S. Frey, Stephan Meier. 2004

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fbfb7954c3a1371f6c96efb79261b30460640a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Attitudes Towards Paying Taxes in Austria: An Empirical Analysis (2005, background): “We also observe among Austria’s people that “conditional cooperation” (see Frey and Meier, 2004; Frey and Torgler, 2004) is relevant.”
Environmental Policy Theory Given Bounded Rationality and Other-regarding Preferences (2011, background): “Other examples are reciprocal behaviors found in the context of blood donations (Titmuss 1970), contributions to a social fund (Frey and Meier 2004), and employment relations (Gneezy and List 2006) (see also Sect.”
Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation (2006, background): “In another context, Frey and Meier (2004a) observe that people differ in their pro- - 10 - social attitudes.”
When helping helps: autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. (2010, background): “…H. Schwartz & Bilsky, 1990) and includes helpful interventions (e.g., Batson, 1987; Cialdini et al., 1987), volunteer work (e.g., Foster, Mourato, Pearce, & Ozdemiroglu, 2001; Freeman, 1997), and the donating of money (Frey & Meier, 2004) or blood (Piliavin & Callero, 1991), among other examples.”
The external validity of giving in the dictator game (2012, background): “Only eight (starting with a study by Frey and Meier 2004) are dealing with other-regarding preferences or cooperation.”
Do people behave in experiments as in the field?—evidence from donations (2008, methodology): “We obtained a panel data set from the University administration composed of the decisions of all students during their time at the University (for more details on the decision setting, see Frey and Meier 2004 ).”
The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier? (2008, background): “The MID of dictators who give can also be compared with those who do not.”
Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling (2014, background): “Psychological lying costs are naturally related to the distance between the subject and victim (actual or intended) (Frey & Meier, 2004; Gneezy, 2005), which, in turn, is largely conditioned by the nature of experimental task.”
Not guilty? Another look at the nature and nurture of economics students (2003, unknown): “More precisely, the argument is that economics students deliberately choose to study economics because they are already different or have different views than other students (see Carter and Irons 1991 ,o r for a recent corroboration Frey and Meier 2004a, 2004b ).”
The Psychology of Charitable Donations to Disaster Victims and Beyond (2015, background): “Of course, other disciplines have grappled with this question, for example, economics (e.g., Andreoni, 1998; Frey & Meier, 2004; Smeaton, Marsh, Rajkumar, & Thomas, 2004), sociology (e.g., Simmons, 1991) and marketing research (e.g., Krishna, 2011; Louie & Obermiller, 2000; Webb, Green, & Brashear,…”
Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part two: gender, marital status, income, and wealth (2012, methodology): “Table 1: Gender difference in giving to different types of organisations Men Women Health LG Bekkers (2007) € Jackson and Latané (1981) LG Andreoni et al (2003) LG Keyt et al (2002) LG Midlarsky and Hannah (1989) LG Weyant (1984) € Andreoni et al (2003) € Chang (2005b) € Eckel et al (2005) Human ser”
Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation (2014, unknown): “Also, information on the giving decisions of others may be in ﬂ uential to the decision to donate (for some examples, see Frey and Meier, 2004; Shang and Croson, 2009; Andreoni and Petrie, 2004; Soetevent, 2005; Potters et al., 2007).”