Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling

By Stephen Mark Rosenbaum, Stephan Billinger, Nils Stieglitz. 2014

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86d62bfbd9ab1fbccc3c70b017bc4787fd4ea7da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Holger A. Rau
2. David Pascual-Ezama
3. Catrine Jacobsen
4. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard
5. Kerstin Grosch

In General Decision Sciences

1. Holger A. Rau
2. David Pascual-Ezama
3. Catrine Jacobsen
4. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard
5. Kerstin Grosch

In Safety Research

1. Holger A. Rau
2. David Pascual-Ezama
3. Catrine Jacobsen
4. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard
5. Kerstin Grosch

Citations in the corpus

• Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “This temporal discounting mechanism makes people more likely to act dishonestly the closer the payoff is to the present (Ruffle and Tobol, 2014). Ruffle and Tobol (2014) find that people who face opportunities to act dishonestly do so to a much larger degree when the outcome of the acts is ‘paid out”
• Gender Differences in Honesty: The Role of Social Value Orientation (2017, background): “, we confirm previous findings of gender differences (Rosenbaum et al. 2014).”