Questioning Gender and Sexual Identity: Dynamic Links Over Time
By L. Diamond, Molly R. Butterworth. 2008
281 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f8ae54f55224699a8ea71c284e5acc3484b3748
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- S. Shields
- Leah R. Warner
- Isis H. Settles
- Jay N. Bettergarcia
- Cris P. Youssef
- C. Tate
- S. Brzuzy
- Julie L. Nagoshi
In Social Psychology
- Leah R. Warner
- S. Shields
- Isis H. Settles
- S. Brzuzy
- Julie L. Nagoshi
- Heather K. Terrell
- Kaitlin McCormick-Huhn
- Holly B. Kozee
Citations in the corpus
- Deconstructing the complex perceptions of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among transgender individuals (2012, background): “Diamond and Butterworth (2008) note the multiplicity of intersectional identities associated with the transgender experience, but if multiple oppressed social identities are merely the product of multiple social forces, all of which can be queered, there is no explanation of how individuals navigate”
- Measuring Transgender Individuals’ Comfort With Gender Identity and Appearance (2012, background): “Therefore, TCS scores likely fluctuate over time because individuals’ relationships with their transgender identity are likely to change (Diamond & Butterworth, 2008; Diamond et al., 2011).”
- Integrating the Study of Transgender Spectrum and Cisgender Experiences of Self-Categorization from a Personality Perspective (2014, background): “Most personality research in adulthood has focused on how gender identity intersects with sexual identity (e.g., Diamond & Butterworth, 2008) or whether women and men differ on purportedly universal personality traits (e.g., Srivastava et al., 2003).”
- A Best Practices Guide to Intersectional Approaches in Psychological Research (2008, methodology): “Several researchers have recommended methods that examine changes over time, such as growth curve modeling (Mattis et al. 2008 )a nd quantitative and qualitative longitudinal studies ( Diamond and Butterworth 2008 ; M attis et al.2008).”
- Being Transgender (2014, background): “Furthermore, participants’ perceived sex and gender were linked inextricably to other parts of their identity (e.g., race and SES; see Diamond & Butterworth, 2008, regarding intersectionality in violence against transgender people).”
- Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research (2016, unknown): “…of intersectionality using qualitative methods exist (e.g., Bowleg, Teti, Malebranche, & Tschann, 2013; Calasanti, Pietilä, Ojala, & King, 2013; Diamond & Butterworth, 2008; Hurtado & Sinha, 2008; Settles, 2006; Tolhurst et al., 2012), yet few applications in quantitative methods exist, and…”
- Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind (2019, background): “, Dowling (2017), Ferguson (2017), Petrow (2016). 18See the Instagram hashtag “#thisiswhatnblookslike.”
- Gender and Adolescent Development. (2011, background): “By adolescence, most youths have a firm understanding of their membership in a gender category, though a few do not (Diamond & Butterworth, 2008).”
- The terminology of identities between, outside and beyond the gender binary – A systematic review (2019, background): “There were also three articles commenting on a paradigm shift, two from the 1980s describing a shift away from “masculine” and “feminine” traits being seen as unidimensional model (Bockting, 2008; Diamond & Butterworth, 2008; Robinson & Green, 1981) Figure 1.”
- What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants (2019, background): “Another shift entails thinking of participants’ social group memberships as dynamically constructed across situational, historical, and geographical contexts (e.g., Cho, Crenshaw, & McCall, 2013; Diamond & Butterworth, 2008; Yuval-Davis, 2006).”
- Queering gender: studying gender identity in ‘normative’ individuals (2014, background): “However, the complementary assumption, namely, that non-binary gender identification and gender variance are rare phenomena in ‘normative’ people (Bockting, 2008; Cohen-Kettenis & Pfäfflin, 2010; Diamond & Butterworth, 2008; Sanger, 2008), has never been put to test.”