On bad decisions and deciding badly: When intention-behavior inconsistency is regrettable
By Rik Pieters, M. Zeelenberg. 2005
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e22eaf782e02cd02030f547487c0c6b4fe1db0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0 (2007, background): “We recently tested the idea of two sources of regret in the context of intention-behavior consistency (Pieters & Zeelenberg, 2005).”
- Regret aversion and decision process quality: Effects of regret salience on decision process carefulness (2008, methodology): “Based on Janis and Mann’s (1977) original work and the recent research on decision process quality and regret (Connolly & Reb, 2005; Pieters & Zeelenberg, 2005; Reb & Connolly, 2004) we predict that increased regret aversion, or anticipatory regret, will lead to more careful – or “vigilant” –…”
- Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: The case of penalty kicks (2007, unknown): “Kruger, Wirtz and Miller (2005) look at the decision whether to change a previous answer on a multiple-choice test, and Pieters and Zeelenberg (2005) examine voting in the national elections in The Netherlands.”
- Feeling Is for Doing: A Pragmatic Approach to the Study of Emotions in Economic Behavior (2006, background): “Of course other emotions may play a role in decision making, such as anger, frustration, and pride, but regret and disappointment are very much tied to the decision process and its outcomes ( Pieters & Zeelenberg, 2005 ).”
- Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste (2011, background): “This distinction has received substantial empirical support—for example, Pieters and Zeelenberg (2005) measured voters' regret before the outcome of the vote was experienced (i.e., before the new government took power) and showed that regret was predicted by people's perceptions of their voting…”