Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries
By L. Kenworthy, J. Pontusson. Perspectives on Politics, 2005
556 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dea45198c68f20a4f3c75297e401ec8db1e3885
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- L. Mccall
- Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
- Ursula Dallinger
- John Stephens
- J. Pontusson
- A. Cobb
- L. Kenworthy
- David Rueda
In Political Science and International Relations
- Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran
- P. Beramendi
- John Stephens
- David Rueda
- L. Kenworthy
- Philipp Rehm
- Ursula Dallinger
- Bo Rothstein
Citations in the corpus
- Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, background): “…welfare regime theory, on the other hand, suggests that one should observe strong support for redistribution in countries where inequality is low because preferences for redistribution and inequality both express culturally determined ‘tastes for equality’ (Kenworthy and Pontusson, 2005, p. 459).”
- Income inequality and redistribution in post-industrial democracies: demographic, economic and political determinants (2014, background): “Accordingly, we expect a higher level of single-parent families to result in higher levels of household income inequality (Bradley et al., 2003; Kenworthy and Pontusson, 2005; OECD, 2008).”
- Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences (2016, background): “542 Comparative Political Studies 49(4) and transfers have, which is typically measured as the (proportional) reduction in the Gini coefficient comparing market and disposable income distributions (Bradley, Huber, Moller, Nielsen, & Stephens, 2003; Kenworthy & Pontusson, 2005).”
- Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000 (2007, unknown): “…the classic trade 3+ See Boix 1998; Garrett 1998; and Iversen and Cusack 2000+ 4+ See Beramendi and Cusack 2004; Esping-Andersen 1990; Garrett 1998; Kenworthy and Pontus- son 2005; Pontusson, Rueda, and Way 2002; and Wallerstein 1999+ 5+ See Bradley et al+ 2003; Moene and Wallerstein 2001; Oatley…”
- How Firms Shape Income Inequality: Stakeholder Power, Executive Decision Making, and the Structuring of Employment Relationships (2015, background): “Public Policy Economic, political science, and sociological research also points to the direct role of public policy in impacting societal-level income inequality (e.g., Heathcote, Perri, & Violante, 2010; Kenworthy & Pontusson, 2005).”
- The Political and Economic Consequences of Populist Rule in Latin America (2016, unknown): “Other authors have also relied on the difference between pre- and post-tax/ transfer inequality to measure redistribution, albeit not to study populism (e.g. Kenworthy and Pontusson 2005).”
- The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States (2010, result): “It deserves to be noted, however, that the pattern of within-country variation broadly conforms to the core prediction of the Meltzer–Richard model (see Kenworthy & Pontusson, 2005).”
- Educational mismatch, wages, and wage growth: Overeducation in Sweden, 1974-2000 (2009, background): “With regard to wage inequality, a trend toward decreasing wage differences was reversed in the 1980s and Sweden has since experienced an increase in inequality (Katz and Autor 1999, le Grand et al. 2001, Kenworthy and Pontusson 2005).”