Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000

By Nathan M. Jensen, G. Rosas. International Organization, 2007

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What We Talk About When We Talk About Foreign Direct Investment (2014, background): “Rather, the purpose of this section is to show that the empirical relationship between FDI and democracy is highly sensitive to how FDI is operationalized and, moreover, that models using measures that my argument suggests should better proxy for political risk sensitive investments generate results”
Globalization and Poverty in Senegal: A Worst Case Scenario? (2011, background): “countries (Feenstra and Hanson, 1997; Jensen and Rosas, 2007) while others have demonstrated the absence of such a link (Lindert and Williamson, 2001; Milanovic,”
FDI and Income Inequality: Evidence from a Panel of U.S. States (2012, unknown): “Similarly, Jensen and Rosas (2007) argue that FDI in Mexico has widened income inequality in the south which was considerably less exposed to FDI inflows than the northern states bordering the United States.”
Fortune or Evil? The Effect of Inward Foreign Direct Investment on Corruption (2016, background): “…consequences of global integration through foreign direct investment (FDI) and the activities of multinational corporation (MNC) (among others, Jensen, Biglaiser, Li, Malesky, Pinto, Pinto and Staats 2012; Jensen and Rosas 2007; Jensen 2006; Li and Resnick 2003; Pandya 2013; Pinto 2013; Zhu 2012).”