The Effect of Social Presence on the Facial and Verbal Expression of Emotion and the Interrelationships Among Emotion Components

By V. Lee, Hugh L. Wagner. 2002

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review (2008, background): “A second function is that non-verbal cues may intensify or tone down the emotion expression (Lee & Wagner, 2002 ).”
Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context (2007, background): “Results from Lee and Wagner (2002) which showed that people displayed more in emotions in positive contexts than in negative contexts, could not be replicated in CMC.”
Emoticons and Online Message Interpretation (2008, background): “This is in line with the power of nonverbal cues to intensify a verbal message in F2F communication (Lee & Wagner, 2002).”
I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes ☆ (2008, background): “A long line of research in social psychology has demonstrated that exposure to emotional stimuli can affect one's facial expressions (e.g. Lee & Wagner, 2002) and that exhibiting a particular facial expression can elicit the corresponding emotion (Adelmann & Zajonc, 1989).”
Coherence between Emotion and Facial Expression: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments (2013, background): “…or observer ratings of “happy” facial expressions ranged from nonsignificant (.09, Mehu, Grammer, & Dunbar, 2007; .24, Bonanno & Keltner, 2004; .31, Lee & Wagner, 2002, social condition) to moderate (.35, Keltner & Bonanno, 1997; .38, Hall & Horgan, 2003, low-power condition, Experiment 3; .42,…”