A self-determined perspective of the Sport Education Model
By Dana Perlman, Grace Goc Karp. 2010
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c47e81f66597c8b1dfce23d59a067506754c7a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Diego Martínez de Ojeda
- Antonio Calderón Luquín
- P. Hastie
- Stephen Harvey
- A. Casey
- K. Jarrett
- M. Curtner-Smith
- C. Farias
In Social Psychology
- Diego Martínez de Ojeda
- Antonio Calderón Luquín
- P. Hastie
- Stephen Harvey
- K. Jarrett
- Dana Perlman
- M. Curtner-Smith
- Tristan L. Wallhead
Citations in the corpus
- A review of research on Sport Education: 2004 to the present (2011, methodology): “This idea is supported by Perlman and Goc Karp (2010) who also suggested that the structural aspects of Sport Education assist in facilitating movement along the self-determined continuum through support for relatedness, competence and autonomy.”
- Motivational processes in Sport Education programs among high school students (2018, unknown): “Ninth grade (aged 14–15) was the most frequently studied grade level, included in more than half of the studies and exclusively in seven studies (Perlman, 2010, 2011, 2012a; Perlman and Caputi, 2017; Sinelnikov and Hastie, 2010; Smither and Zhu, 2011; Wallhead and Ntoumanis, 2004).”
- Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies (2020, unknown): “In terms of gameplay specifically, there was a noticeable separation between motivated and amotivated students, where field notes confirmed that the highly motivated students dominated (Perlman, 2010).”