How May Consumer Policy Empower Consumers for Sustainable Lifestyles?

By John Th⊘gersen. 2005

501 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b00918f7f8bb890bb9df87ca967048ea96e34e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability (2011, background): “mindset, then consumer education is the right vehicle for marketers to uses (Thøgersen 2005).”
Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers (2015, background): “Some studies investigate barriers to consumer engagement in proenvironmental lifestyles, searching for actions that might “empower” consumers such as product labeling and education programs (Thøgersen, 2005).”
“Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes? (2015, background): “ever, especially in light of some prior research suggesting that guilt appeals in particular may have a limited effect on consumer behavior (Bennett 1998; Peloza et al. 2012; Thøgersen 2005).”
One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem (2012, background): “(Thøgersen 2005, pp. 167–168).”
Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap (2020, background): “Sustainable consumption behavior refers to the extent to which individuals’ choices and actions toward products and services lessen environmental impacts, lessen the change of available materials or energy in the environment, or alter the structure of ecosystems [17] (Thøgersen, 2005).”
Country Differences in Sustainable Consumption: The Case of Organic Food (2010, background): “…attitudes, and values (e.g., Magnusson et al. 2001; Thøgersen 2009), that is, factors influencing consumer motivation to buy organic food, as well as factors influencing their ability to do so, such as income, task-relevant knowledge, and habits (e.g., Thøgersen 2005a; Thøgersen and Ölander 2006).”
Understanding perceived environment quality in affecting tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviours: A broken windows theory perspective (2019, background): “Contextual factors (e.g. physical environment) may influence people’s ERBs through psychosocial factors, such as attitudes and moral obligation (Steg & Vlek, 2009; Stern, 1999; Thøgersen, 2005).”
Varieties of Environmental Labelling, Market Structures, and Sustainable Consumption Across Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational and Market Supply Determinants of Environmental-Labelled Goods (2011, background): “... individualistic explanations of sustainable consumerism (Bjorner et al. 2004; Micheletti et al. 2004; OECD 1997, 2005; Stolle et al. 2005; Teisl et al. 2008; Thogersen 2000; van Amstel et al. 2008), only recently there has been an increasing focus on institutional, structural, and cultural deter”
An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict the Usage Intention of the Electric Car: A Multi-Group Comparison (2015, background): “This is affected by the perception of one’s own skills but also by the eventual constraints or facilitators in the context of the decision [27–29].”