Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants
By Maximilian Goethner, M. Obschonka, R. Silbereisen, Uwe Cantner. 2012
287 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ad2d9ca66e754ae8e3c431474b68bae07d83725
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Carlota L. Aza
- A. Lanero
- Matthias Fink
- Teemu Kautonen
- Mirjam Knockaert
- S. Karimi
- J. Vázquez
- M. Obschonka
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- S. Karimi
- Teemu Kautonen
- Tommaso Minola
- Matthias Fink
- M. Obschonka
- M. van Gelderen
- Giuseppe Criaco
- Rachel S. Shinnar
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- S. Karimi
- Teemu Kautonen
- Matthias Fink
- Tommaso Minola
- M. van Gelderen
- M. Obschonka
- Giuseppe Criaco
- Mirjam Knockaert
Citations in the corpus
- Entrepreneurial intentions and start-ups: Are women or men more likely to enact their intentions? (2018, background): “While some empirical studies have shown a positive relationship between EI and actual behaviour in starting businesses (Goethner et al., 2012; Kautonen et al., 2013, 2015; Kolvereid and Isaksen, 2006; Rauch and Hulsink, 2015; Van Gelderen et al., 2015), research also acknowledges that individuals…”
- The role of entrepreneurial passion in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intentions (2020, background): “Based on the entrepreneurship literature (Fini et al. 2012; Goethner et al. 2012; Nabi and Francisco 2013), SN is less relevant than ATE and PBC for EI as entrepreneurs can be mainly characterized as more inner-directed and less oriented towards social norms compared to non-entrepreneurs (Goethner…”
- The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations on Academics’ Entrepreneurial Intention (2016, background): “Investigating entrepreneurial intention is therefore an important research task which helps to understand and predict entrepreneurship [10,11], because it allows us to shed light on the transition processes of entrepreneurship [12,13].”
- Social cognitive determinants of entrepreneurial career choice in university students (2016, background): “…Vroom, 1964), ambitions to obtain certain outcomes (instrumentality) determine the formation of positive attitudes when such consequences are valued (valence); hence, outcome expectations and desirability represent related but independent constructs (Goethner et al., 2012; Liñán and Chen, 2009).”
- An Analysis of the Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions among Students: A Romanian Case Study (2016, background): “Therefore, from a methodological point of view, our study differs from others [2,18,99,100], as it identifies several discrete dimensions of the students’ entrepreneurial intentions.”
- Age, culture, and self-employment motivation (2015, background): “…the theory of planned behavior, deem desirability and feasibility beliefs as core elements through which background motivational factors (e.g., personality factors such as risk-taking, goal orientation, motives, career-stage-specific factors) affect entrepreneurship (e.g., Goethner et al. 2012).”
- From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: Self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion (2015, background): “Although numerous studies have examined the formation of entrepreneurial intentions (Schlaegel and Koenig, 2014), research on the intention–action link in the context of new venture creation has emerged only recently (Gielnik et al., 2014; Goethner et al., 2012; Kautonen et al., 2013).”
- The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, background): “On the contrary, Goethner et al. (2012), with reference to social norms in academic entrepreneurship, and Autio et al. (2001), with specific reference to social norms in student entrepreneurship, found no effect or weak effect, respectively, on entrepreneurial intention.”
- Unraveling the “passion orchestra” in academia (2016, background): “Specifically, while prior research points to the importance of researchers’ personal networks, perceived role models, academic experience and engagement in applied research (Prodan and Drnovsek, 2010), as well as attitudes, perceived control, social norms and group identification (Goethner et al., 2”
- Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions (2015, background): “…PBC explain 31% of the variation in subsequent behavior, which is in line with results of meta-analyses in other behavioral domains (Armitage & Conner, 2001; Sheeran, 2002), as well as on a par with the closest comparable studies in entrepreneurship (Goethner et al., 2012; Kautonen et al., 2013).”
- Academic entrepreneurship in Spanish universities: an analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurial intention (2017, methodology): “The sparse literature on scientists’ motivations and EA towards their own engagement in entrepreneurial activities suggests that they allocate effort and time to entrepreneurship if they perceive that activity as positive and professionally stimulating as well as having the potential to provide comm”