Classroom-based assessment: Changing knowledge and practice through preservice teacher education
By Peg Graham. 2005
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a4f1e8eb9aa3ff3eb55badd9b9a5522591f3764
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Juliann M. Kaftan
- Teresa Chavez
- Sheryl L. Honig
- Amy E. Trauth-Nare
- Christopher DeLuca
- Debra J Tomanek
- Aarti P. Bellara
- Chunhua Cao
Citations in the corpus
- Language assessment literacy: what do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? (2020, background): “…to examine teacher assessment literacy levels (Campbell & Collins, 2007; DeLuca, 2012; DeLuca, Klinger, et al., 2015; Fan, Wang, & Wang, 2011; Graham, 2005; Greenberg & Walsh, 2012; Hill, Ell, Grudnoff, & Limbrick, 2014; Koh, 2011; Lam, 2015; Leahy & Wiliam, 2012; Lukin, Bandalos, Eckhout, &…”
- Making formative assessment discernable to pre‐service teachers of science (2010, methodology): “Methods used in prior research have been primarily content analyses of course documents to develop theoretical frameworks of novice teachers’ conceptions of classroom assessment (Graham, 2005; Maclellan, 2004; Otero & Nathan, 2008).”
- Pedagogies for Preservice Assessment Education: Supporting Teacher Candidates' Assessment Literacy Development (2013, methodology): “E-mail: cdeluca@queensu.ca 128 literacy levels (DeLuca, Klinger, Searle, & Shulha, 2010; Graham, 2005; Popham, 2004, 2011).”
- Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? (2013, background): “Most studies have focused on describing teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about assessment (Graham, 2005; Maclellan, 2004; Ruiz-Primo & Shavelson, 1996; Wang, Kao, & Lin, 2010), cataloguing the types of assessment tools most commonly used by teachers (Campbell & Evans, 2001), or analyzing teachers’ ge”
- A classroom data literacy intervention for pre-service teachers (2015, background): “In light of evidence that contextualized professional dialogue is effective in shaping pre-service teacher thinking about assessment (Graham, 2005), and our own findings about the frequencies of concurrent learning experiences, research should also investigate how pre-service teachers develop data l”