[Editorial] Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it

By Tobias Hahn, Frank Figge, J. Pinkse, Lutz Preuss. 2010

676 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49a368c49667df03c50fa902dcdb46dba3ddefc2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. A. Schneider
2. Frank Figge
3. Tobias Hahn
4. M. Smink
5. Marko P. Hekkert
6. Antony Paulraj
7. Diane Holt
8. Injazz J. Chen

In Strategy and Management

1. Marko P. Hekkert
2. Tobias Hahn
3. Frank Figge
4. Constantin Blome
5. A. Schneider
6. Simona Negro
7. M. Smink
8. Injazz J. Chen

Citations in the corpus

• Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies (2015, background): “A similar call is made in the field of environmental management: more attention should be paid to the pervasive trade-offs in terms of profit, people and planet that firms face when deciding on their strategy (Hahn et al., 2010; Pinkse and Kolk, 2010; Winn et al., 2012).”
• Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability (2014, background): “However, despite the rising popularity of the term sustainability in praxis, the market-centred perspective is currently predominant in the majority of the theoretical approaches to corporate sustainability (Hahn et al. 2010).”
• Is Green and Profitable Sustainable? Assessing the Trade-Off between Economic and Environmental Aspects (2013, background): “There are at the same time vast differences in terms of the use of economic, environmental and social resources across the different manufacturers (Hahn et al., 2010a).”
• Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development (2013, background): “However, a positive linear relationship is not always fit into the relationship between environmental and economic performance (Hahn et al., 2010).”
• Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework (2014, neutral): “These shortcomings of the instrumental logic have more recently led to the emergence of an integrative view on corporate sustainability (Berger et al. 2007; Gao and Bansal 2013; Hahn et al. 2010; Kleine and Hauff 2009; Liu 2012).”
• Motives and Performance Outcomes of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices: A Multi-theoretical Perspective (2017, background): “…that it does pay to be green (Golicic and Smith 2013), some researchers maintain that firms often have no choice but to adopt sustainable supply-chain practices even though such practices may have uncertain or even negative impacts on their performance (e.g., Hahn et al. 2010; Winn et al. 2012).”