Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach
By Dries Faems, Bart Van Looy, Koenraad Debackere. 2005
1,269 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/488b24b1f6c6c9b42d4def3957f0848545e1ec5d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Petra Andries
- Dirk Czarnitzki
- Geert Duysters
- Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke
- Boris Lokshin
- M. Visser
- Dries Faems
- Olli‐Pekka Kauppila
In Strategy and Management
- Boris Lokshin
- Geert Duysters
- Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke
- Petra Andries
- Dries Faems
- Andrés Barge-Gil
- Cindy Lopes-Bento
- Hanna Hottenrott
Citations in the corpus
- Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance (2010, methodology): “Following Faems et al. (2005) we used the composition of turnover in 2005 in order to make a distinction between derivative and breakthrough innovation performance.”
- TOWARD A DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE ON OPEN INNOVATION: A LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF THE (2009, background): “Formal collaboration with external partners for innovation activities has been recognized as a viable mechanism to accomplish a shift towards an open innovation model (Chesbrough, 2003a; Faems et al., 2005; Poot, 2004).”
- Technology Parks versus Science Parks: does the university make the difference? (2013, background): “…and Hottenrott, 2009; Frenz and Ietto-Gillies, 2009; Tsai, 2009) and firm age (Czarnitzki and Hottenrott, 2009) for explaining sales of new to the market products, and the insignificant influence of industry when other factors are accounted for (Frenz and Ietto-Gillies, 2009; Faems et al., 2005).”
- Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process (2017, background): “The few studies that investigate openness-performance linkages and also consider an appropriability component often restrict appropriability measures to, for instance, patents (see e.g. Faems et al., 2005).”
- Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance (2014, background): “The extant literature provides ample evidence on the performance consequences of R&D collaboration (e.g. Becker and Dietz 2004; Dyer and Singh 1998; Singh and Mitchell 2005; Faems et al. 2005; Duysters and Lokshin 2011; Nieto and Santamaria 2007).”