A Profile of Teaching Techniques Used in the University Classroom

By W. Lammers, J. Murphy. 2002

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

To Control or Not to Control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education (2003, background): “Lammers and Murphy (2002) found that the lecture continues to be the major form of instruction in universities, by a considerable margin.”
The desired teaching qualities of lecturers in higher education: a means end analysis (2006, background): “According to Lammers and Murphy (2002), students regard highly lecturers who are enthusiastic about their subject, inspiring, knowledgeable, and helpful.”
Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and opportunities (2010, background): “A similar point is made by Lammers and Murphy ( 2002 ) when they state that ‘an instructor's profile of teaching techniques is not as indicative of student learning as the quality and context with which the techniques are used’ (2).”
A review of the one-minute paper (2005, background): “…the traditional passive lecture remains the single most prevalent teaching tool, although its dominance has declined in recent years owing to the increased discussion of, and research on, active learning methods (Bligh, 1998: 6; Brawner et al., 2002; Lammers and Murphy, 2002; Markham et al., 1998).”