Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia
By Bruce F. Pennington, C. Cardoso-Martins, P. Green, D. Lefly. 2001
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48366ae4a1f78be686fe3e4af066c52e7d650f60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: A Meta-Analysis. (2014, background): “…as the reading of irregular words or high-frequency words) compared to tasks requiring phonological decoding skills (such as non-word reading; e.g., Araújo et al., 2011; Clarke, Hulme, & Snowling, 2005; Georgiou, Parrila, Kirby, & Stephenson, 2008; Pennington et al., 2001; Savage et al., 2005).”
- A Meta-Analytic Review of Naming-Speed Deficits in Developmental Dyslexia (2019, background): “It is, therefore, unlikely that the phonological component of RAN performance (Clarke et al., 2005; Pennington et al., 2001; Wagner & Torgesen, 1987; Wagner et al., 1993; Wolf & Bowers, 1999) and, in particular, the phonological problems that feature dyslexia are associated with the encoding and ret”
- The Relationship Between Phoneme Awareness and Rapid Serial Naming Skills and Literacy Acquisition: The Role of Developmental Period and Reading Ability (2004, background): “Indeed, rapid naming has been consistently found to be related to fluency of text reading (Bowers, 1995; Morris et al., 1998; Pennington et al., 2001).”