Social categorization moderates social projection.

By Russell W. Clement, Joachim I. Krueger. 2002

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47e70b1bec25e686784238a971322754c6b815de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. (2009, background): “This is because projection of positive self traits to similar others (i.e., the ingroup) is generally stronger for ingroups than outgroups (Clement & Krueger, 2002) and occurs in lieu of stereotyping (Ames, 2004).”
Two Egocentric Sources of the Decision to Vote: The Voter's Illusion and the Belief in Personal Relevance (2004, background): “Because people are more likely to project to members of an ingroup than to members of an outgroup (Clement & Krueger, 2002), they also tend to cooperate more with the former (Yamagishi & Kiyonari, 2000).”
The Imagined Contact Hypothesis (2012, background): “This is because projection of positive self traits to similar others (i.e., the ingroup) is generally stronger for ingroups than outgroups (Clement & Krueger, 2002).”
The dangers of distrustful complacency: Low concern and low political trust combine to undermine compliance with governmental restrictions in the emerging Covid-19 pandemic (2020, background): “…who show distrustful complacency should be motivated to bolster their selfconcept indirectly, which could be done by showing evaluative favourability towards others who share their own orientation (see research on the egocentric bias motive; Clement & Krueger, 2002; Robbins & Krueger, 2005).”
Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model (2007, background): “However, those older phenomena, if they were studied in the context of groups at all, referred to the projection from the individual self to the ingroup (Clement & Krueger, 2002 ; Krueger, 2007 ; Mullen, Dovidio, Johnson, & Copper, 1992 ).”
Age stereotypes and self-views in later life: Evaluating rival assumptions (2003, background): “This might be due to an externalisation of positive selfviews to other members of the same social group to which one belongs (Clement & Krueger, 2002).”
Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis (2005, unknown): “, 2001 ) , and new outgroup members lose it ( Clement & Krueger , 2002 ) .”
From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects (2010, background): “This is because projection of positive self traits to similar others (ie, the ingroup) is generally stronger for ingroups than outgroups (Clement & Krueger, 2002 ).”
From social projection to social behaviour (2007, background): “Disambiguity : Social projection is observed when no stereotypes exist (ie, in minimal laboratory groups), whereas no comparable case for unambiguous self-stereotyping exists (Clement & Krueger, 2002 ).”
Moving Opportunism to the Back Seat: Bounded Rationality, Costly Conflict, and Hierarchical Forms (2016, background): “Social projection is much stronger toward ingroup members than individuals who are clearly in the outgroup (Clement & Krueger, 2002; Robbins & Krueger, 2005).”