Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Theoretical and Empirical Examination of the Consequences of Differing Construct Representations

By Bradley A. George. 2011

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/478edf58020962f08cc1e83232e3ce13f480ca4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Creativity, self-efficacy, and small-firm performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation (2015, background): “The EO concept has raised a series of debates in the literature regarding the nature of the concept (George 2011; George and Marino 2011).”
Strategic entrepreneurship: mediating the entrepreneurial orientation-performance link (2016, background): “The construct is reconfigured and reconceptualized with detailed discussions on epistemological and ontological differences of difference conceptualization (Anderson et al., 2014; George, 2011; George and Marino, 2011; Miller, 2011; Wales et al., 2015).”
In Pursuit of Greatness: CEO Narcissism, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance Variance (2013, unknown): “Hence, EO captures the extent to which organizations may be considered entrepreneurial in their firm-level activities and strategic behaviors (Covin and Wales, 2012; George, 2011; Hoskisson et al., 2011).”
From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities (2017, background): “Therefore, when each dimension varies independently, we cannot consider this behavior as entrepreneurial, and EO should be perceived as a second-order reflective model (George, 2011).”
Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation (2015, unknown): “Active and constructive scholarly debate on the ontological assumptions of our theoretical constructs is healthy for scientific discourse (Bagozzi, Yi, and Phillips, 1991). However, when such arguments remain salient despite a proliferation of research on the EO phenomenon, it becomes apparent that ”
Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions (2016, background): “…measurement model cannot be considered to be more or less inherently appropriate (Covin and Wales, 2012), arguments have been put forth in favor of measuring the EO construct reflectively (Covin and Wales, 2012; George, 2011; George and Marino, 2011) as well as formatively (Anderson et al., 2015).”
Revitalizing Entrepreneurship: The Search for New Research Opportunities (2011, unknown): “In this special issue, George (2011) examines whether these three basic sub-dimensions are formative or reflective of the overall dimension of EO.”
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future (2009, unknown): “*George, G., Wood, D. R. Jr, Khan, R. (2001). Networking Strategy of Boards: Implications for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.”
Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior (2021, background): “As discussed at length in the EO literature (George, 2011; George & Marino, 2011), one of the theoretical and empirical issues surrounding the multidimensional approach is that each dimension likely has its own distinctive antecedents as they are modeled to account for the unique variance in each— u”