Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice
By Andrew Booth. Library hi tech, 2006
313 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47010d3847f5cc2901466944717a6c430826317f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Tove Faber Frandsen
- M. Eriksen
- R. Cadario
- Pierre Chandon
- Debbie M. Smith
- Alison Louise Cooke
- Andrew Booth
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018, methodology): “Despite the existence of other models—such as sample, phenomenon of interest, design, evaluation, research type (SPIDER) [7] and setting, perspective, intervention, comparison, evaluation (SPICE) [8]— the PICO model is by far the most widely used model for formulating clinical questions.”
- Beyond PICO (2012, methodology): “SPICE was developed in the context of evidence-based librarianship and subsequently promoted by the Joanna Briggs Institute for qualitative systematic reviews (Booth, 2006).”
- Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments (2018, methodology): “Inclusion Criteria Online Appendix A provides detailed information on the search strategy, including the setting, population, intervention, comparison, valuation framework (Booth 2006) for the selection of keywords and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Moher et ”