Tove Faber Frandsen
General Health Professions · 2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- General Health Professions — 5 citations into it
- Statistics and Probability — 5 citations into it
Whom Tove Faber Frandsen trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from Tove Faber Frandsen's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Tove Faber Frandsen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
- PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (BMC Health Services Research)
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
- Evaluation of PICO as a Knowledge Representation for Clinical Questions (American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium)
- Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice (Library hi tech)
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)