The self‐concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non‐gifted students: a meta‐analysis

By Kristy Litster, J. Roberts. 2011

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/458bcb4ce0a00f8f7dab79a215336017654e94c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Sietske van Viersen
2. J. Reijnders
3. Marieke M. N. Middel-Lalleman
4. M. van Hooijdonk
5. Evelyn H. Kroesbergen
6. J. V. Van Luit
7. Radhika Misquitta

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Sietske van Viersen
2. J. Reijnders
3. Marieke M. N. Middel-Lalleman
4. M. van Hooijdonk
5. Evelyn H. Kroesbergen
6. J. V. Van Luit

In Social Psychology

1. Sietske van Viersen
2. J. Reijnders
3. Marieke M. N. Middel-Lalleman
4. M. van Hooijdonk
5. Evelyn H. Kroesbergen

Citations in the corpus

• The Psychological Well-Being of Early Identified Gifted Children (2016, methodology): “In other studies, gifted children were shown to have lower social and physical well-being (Lee et al., 2012; Litster & Roberts, 2011).”