Corporate Social Reporting in the European Context and Human Resource Disclosures: An Analysis of Finnish Companies

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Role of Normative CSR‐Promoting Institutions in Stimulating CSR Disclosures in Developing Countries (2018, background): “…contains information about the inputs (e.g. amount and time spent on product developments etc.), the outputs (e.g. number of people benefited and number of new products introduced etc.) and the third party evidence (e.g. awards and survey results etc.) (see Vuontisjärvi, 2006; Bouten et al., 2011).”
Impact of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on Operating Income: Moderating Role of Regional Disparities in China (2016, unknown): “The fourth method is content analysis, which is a method that defines standard scores and collects information on social responsibility from relevant reports and files, thus measuring CSR based on disclosed social responsibility information (Vuontisjarvi 2006; Montabon et al. 2007; Cornelius et al. ”
A Descriptive Analysis of Environmental Disclosure: A Longitudinal Study of French Companies (2014, background): “(1) It documents the environmental disclosure of French companies, as a complement to previous European (Cormier et al. 2005; Gray et al. 1995; Stray 2008; Vuontisjärvi 2006), American (Bynum et al.”
CSR in an emerging country: a content analysis of CSR reports of listed companies (2011, background): “Parsa and Kouhy, 2008), Demark (Nielsen and Thomsen, 2007), Finland (Vuontisjarv, 2006), Mexico (Paul et al.”