Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World

By D. Tapscott. 2008

1,484 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/450bcae9167d6cd94a222d379e7edbdba325ede3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

One job, one deal…or not: do generations respond differently to psychological contract fulfillment? (2016, background): “Growing up in a digital world, this generation is set to be more geared towards a constant stream of impulses and multi-tasking parallel thinking (Berl 2006; Tapscott 2009).”
Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory (2011, background): “A user’s friends and relatives influence the level of user’s perceived enjoyment in SNS; also, through them, the user has the opportunity to meet new friends, whereby people can expand their social network (Li & Bernoff, 2008; Powell, 2009; Sledgianowski & Kulviwat, 2009; Tapscott, 2008).”
Development of critical spatial thinking through GIS learning (2013, background): “Fostering critical thinking is one of the most crucial learning outcomes for every curriculum (Case, 2005; Tapscott, 2009; Tsui, 2008).”
Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? (2010, methodology): “The Net generation arguments claim that an entire generation who have grown up with technology exhibit different preferences and report different communicative practices to older people (Palfrey & Gasser 2008, Tapscott 2008).”
Customers' need for uniqueness theory versus brand congruence theory: The impact on satisfaction with social network sites (2020, unknown): “This profile acts as a self-representation of the personal information that members share with friends or other SNS members (Cheung, Chiu, & Lee, 2011; Lin & Lu, 2011; Tapscott, 2008).”
Millennial wine consumers: Risk perception and information search (2012, background): “…generation, most experts agree they were born between the years of 1977 and 2000, though these dates vary by source ranging from starting as late as 1983 and ending in 2004 (Gillespie, 2010; Tapscott, 2008; Junco and Mastrodicasa, 2007; Howe and Strauss, 2000), resulting in 70–76 million people.”
Darwin or Lamarck? Future Challenges in Evolutionary Algorithms for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2014, background): “In epigenetics – which very early dealt with questions of evolution [20],[21], it was found that there are special traits which can be inherited without being part of the genetic code; That would, for example, explain a possible higher function of the thumb in the upcoming post-millennial younger ge”
Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism (2013, background): “Generational differences in media use The Baby Boomers, representing 23% of the US population, were the first generation raised with television (Tapscott, 2009).”
A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age (2016, background): “In particular, for more digitally oriented generations, boundaries that differentiate online and offline are becoming more transparent (Tapscott, 2008).”
Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature (2012, background): “Several theorists have noted that pragmatists in higher education are rapidly growing and refer to this group as being part of the ‘‘net’’ generation (Montgomery, 2009; Palfrey & Gasser, 2008; Tapscott, 2008).”
Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment (2013, background): “As well known, over the last few years many commentators have claimed that a new generation of students, who grew up with video games and digital technologies, are now entering universities with high expectations of dramatic changes (Prensky, 2001a, 2001b; Tapscott, 2008).”
Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: a new research agenda (2011, background): “Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology 183 Social context and learning is addressed by Tapscott (2008) who notes that 11–31 yearolds ''show signs of learning differently'' (p. 10) while Palfrey and Gasser (2008), referring to those born after 1980, claim that ''major aspects of their…”
The Role of a Leader in Stimulating Innovation in an Organization (2020, background): “Computers and the Internet were their daily life and due to their high level of digital competence were not a major challenge (Tapscott 2009).”