Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants

By Rajiv Sabherwal, Anand Jeyaraj, Charles K. Chowa. Management Sciences, 2006

762 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44e153e8c1b531c7e8d401f34645e2ce2cf75682

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: a meta analysis (2010, methodology): “Meta-analysis refers to a set of procedures for analyzing coefficients reported by prior published research (Sabherwal et al., 2006).”
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008, background): “…perceived ease of use, hold the key to helping managers make effective decisions about applying speciﬁc interventions to inﬂuence the known determinants of IT adoption and, consequently, the success of new ITs (Rai, Lang, & Welker, 2002; DeLone & McLean, 2003; Sabherwal, Jeyaraj, & Chowa, 2006).”
Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model (2008, background): “results across studies and impedes the establishment of a cumulative research tradition (Sabherwal et al., 2006).”
Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality (2010, methodology): “Another meta-analysis was performed by Sabherwal et al. (2006), whose research was based on 121 previous studies published in the period of 1980–2004.”
The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of "hedonic motivation" use in UTAUT2 (2019, result): “existing research findings including studies with non-significant and contradictory results to derive collective conclusion (Dwivedi et al., 2017; Eden, 2002; Sabherwal et al., 2006).”
Integrating TAM, TPB and TOE frameworks and expanding their characteristic constructs for e-commerce adoption by SMEs (2015, background): “Much exists in literature, which supports that firm size is a major factor affecting the adoption of a technology (see Jeyaraj et al., 2006; Sabherwal et al., 2006) and that size makes for resilience to environmental shocks.”
Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in six Sigma Projects: An empirical investigation (2013, background): “…and McDermott, 2003; Tatikonda and Montoya-Weiss, 2001), information technology development and implementation project teams (Lee and Choi, 2003; Sabherwal et al., 2006), and best practice or new technology implementing project teams in hospitals (Edmondson et al., 2003; Tucker et al., 2007).”
Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2017, methodology): “First, the SEM requires a single sample size for the entire model whereasmeta-analysisyieldsa samplesize foreach relationship in themodel (Carr et al. 2003; Sabherwal et al. 2006).”
What Drives Social Commerce: The Role of Social Support and Relationship Quality (2011, background): “The strength of the tie resulting from the quality of a service provider’s offering will affect a user’s decision and the success of the service provider [12, 40, 43].”
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research (2014, background): “4 Another example is a meta-analysis of IS success research by Sabherwal et al. (2006), who found signiﬁcant effects of contextual factors (i.e., top-management support and facilitating conditions) and user-related factors (i.e., user experience, user training, user attitude, and user…”