Informative sources of math‐related self‐efficacy expectations and their relationship with math‐related self‐efficacy, interest, and preference

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Explaining entrepreneurial intentions, nascent entrepreneurial behavior and new business creation with social cognitive career theory – a 5-year longitudinal analysis (2021, methodology): “2020) and in testing SCCT (e.g., Özyürek 2005; Wang 2013; Wright et al.”
Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions (2008, methodology): “In some cases, researchers neither provide sample items nor carefully describe newly created scales, making it difficult to discern whether guidelines regarding specificity and correspondence were followed (e.g., Bates & Khasawneh, 2007; Özyürek, 2005; Stevens et al., 2006).”
Contextual Factors Related to Math Anxiety in Second-Grade Children (2014, background): “Previous math performance has been shown as the strongest indicator of math self-efficacy (Lopez & Lent, 1992; Ozyurek, 2005), and level of math self-efficacy is a strong predictor of math performance in teens and college students (Pajares, 1996b; Siegel, Galassi, & Ware, 1985).”