Diagnosing misconceptions: Revealing changing decimal fraction knowledge.

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Variability in the natural number bias: Who, when, how, and why (2015, background): “Similarly, when comparing decimal magnitudes, people sometimes choose as larger the decimal that is longer; so, for example, people sometimes judge .835 as greater than .87, because 835 > 87 (Durkin & Rittle-Johnson, 2015).”
Measuring Conceptual Understanding Using Comparative Judgement (2016, unknown): “ For example, the phenomenon of “natural number bias” (Van Hoof, Lijnen, Verschaffel & Van Dooren, 2013) has been researched in detail using specialised tasks that can be adapted to investigate specific hypotheses (e.g. Durkin & Rittle-‐Johnson, 2015).”