Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students ? ? Portions of this pa
By Janet Morahan-Martin, Phyllis A. Schumacher. 2000
1,360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43d96b266cf91e53b257e6f3fbf0a78efe20da9e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Scott E. Caplan
- Robert LaRose
- Mark D. Griffiths
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- Jochen Peter
- Ellen J. Helsper
- Laura Widyanto
- Matthew S. Eastin
In Gender Studies
- Scott E. Caplan
- Jochen Peter
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- Ellen J. Helsper
- S. Goolam
- Andrew Thatcher
- Sally Pui-Man Law
- Man Kit Chang
In Sociology and Political Science
- Mark D. Griffiths
- Scott E. Caplan
- Daria J. Kuss
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- Jochen Peter
- Robert LaRose
- Matthew S. Eastin
- Dmitri Williams
Citations in the corpus
- Psychological Well-Being and Internet Addiction among University Students. (2013, background): “Along with these there are also some educational harms like wasting of time (Griffiths, 2000), decrease in academic performance (Aboujaoude, 2010; Kubey, Lavin, and Barrows, 2001), communication problems with peers (Gross et al., 2002; Morahan-Martin and Schumacher, 2000).”
- Sex offenders, internet child abuse images and emotional avoidance: The importance of values. (2006, background): “Morahan-Martin and Schumacher (2000) talked about the Internet as providing an attractive alternative to a mundane or unhappy life.”
- Preliminary Development of a Model and Measure of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Competence (2006, background): “…with their boyfriend or girlfriend off campus as their most common email activity (Jones, 2002) (continued) percentage of (problematic) users (Caplan, 2002; McKenna et al., 2002; Morahan-Martin & Schumacher, 2000), a finding supported by a Pew (2000) survey in which only 8% of Internet users…”
- Preference for Online Social Interaction (2003, neutral): “…self-disclosure, less perceived social risk (i.e., diminished personal cost if interactions or relationships fail), and less social responsibility toward others and the interaction than in traditional FtF communication (Morahan-Martin & Schumacher, 2000; Turkle, 1995, Wallace, 1999; Walther, 1996).”
- Cognitive Behavior Therapy with Internet Addicts: Treatment Outcomes and Implications (2007, neutral): “Time 96% (109) 4% (5) 0% (0) 100% (114) Relationship 85% (97) 15% (17) 0% (0) 100% (114) Sexual 75% (85) 21% (24) 4% (5) 100% (114) Work 71% (81) 29% (33) 0% (0) 100% (114) Financial 42% (48) 58% (66) 0% (0) 100% (114) Physical 29% (33) 71% (81) 0% (0) 100% (114) Academic 15% (17) 81% (92) 4% (5) 10”
- The Effects of Boredom, Loneliness, and Distress Tolerance on Problem Internet Use Among University Students (2016, background): “…to their studies, browsing the internet generally, and using social networking sites (SNSs) and other communication tools, placing them at greater risk of developing problem internet behaviours (Derbyshire et al. 2013; Kittinger et al. 2012; Kuss et al. 2013; Morahan-Martin and Schumacher 2000).”
- Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates (2007, background): “…1606-6359 print/ISSN 1476-7392 online 2007 Informa UK Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/16066350701350247 of emotional and social skills (Young and Rogers 1998; Morahan-Martin and Schumacher 2000; de Gracia et al. 2002; Whang et al. 2003; Engelberg and Sjoberg 2004; Caplan 2005; Chou et al. 2005; Kim et al.…”
- A Review of the Research on Internet Addiction (2005, background): “Morahan-Martin and Schumacker (2000) report similar findings: the Internet provides a place to relax, escape pressures, and seek excitement.”
- Development and Psychometric Properties of the Problematic Internet use Questionnaire (2005, methodology): “However, Pratarelli and Browne (2002) acknowledged that their model was not robust and concluded that more research in this regard was necessary. In another factor-analytic conceptualisation, Davis, Flett and Besser (2002) developed and validated the Online Cognition Scale (OCS) to measure pathologi”
- Internet Addiction in Students: A Cause of Concern (2003, neutral): “Morahan and Schumaker 10 found that pathological users reported significantly more loneliness as measured by the UCLA loneliness scale.”
- INTERNET USE AMONG YOUNG AND OLDER ADULTS: RELATION TO PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING (2002, background): “Another study (Morahan-Martin & Schumacher, 2000) surveyed 277 college students and found that only 8.1% of the sample could be classied as pathological Internet users.”
- child pornography and the internet: perpetuating a cycle of abuse (2002, background): “One recent study that addressed the role of pornography in the offending process is that of Proulx et al. (1999). Their results suggested that within a population of child molesters there were two distinct pathways to offending; coercive and noncoercive.”
- Internet Addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 Quantitative Research (2009, positive): “36 A number of studies 10,11,23,34,45–49 profiled Internet addicts using demographic characteristics and examined features common to participants that made them more vulnerable to developing an addiction, including psychiatric symptomatology and personality characteristics among excessive Internet…”