Development and Psychometric Properties of the Problematic Internet use Questionnaire

By Andrew Thatcher, S. Goolam. 2005

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ef07b7a539fad24d433f2ef89dd5f7149ff42da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Vikram R. Bhargava
2. M. Velasquez
3. Henri Chabrol
4. Stéphanie Laconi
5. Rachel Florence Rodgers

In Education

1. Vikram R. Bhargava
2. M. Velasquez
3. Henri Chabrol
4. Stéphanie Laconi
5. Rachel Florence Rodgers

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Vikram R. Bhargava
2. M. Velasquez
3. Henri Chabrol
4. Stéphanie Laconi
5. Rachel Florence Rodgers

Citations in the corpus

• Internet Addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 Quantitative Research (2009, unknown): “4,11 However, while Internet addiction has received attention from studies in various fields, 12 no clear definition currently exists.”
• Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction (2020, background): “Thatcher and Goolam (2005) estimated that as many as nine million Americans were addicted to the internet.”
• The measurement of Internet addiction: A critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties (2014, background): “…and pathological gambling 19 5 De Gracia Blanco et al., 2002 Spain .91 1664 15– 54 1.6 Scale for Internet Addiction of Lima (SIAL) Lam-Figueroa et al., 2011 2 Pathological gambling 11 4 Lam-Figueroa et al., 2011 Peru .8S4 248 14 1.1 Thatcher’s Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (TPIUQ)…”