Understanding the Mentoring Process between Adolescents and Adults

By Renée Spencer. 2006

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/438e75fd6938541318de775813f03ebffdb96da4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. L. Eby
2. Tammy D. Allen
3. Nicole Renick Thomson
4. Debra H. Zand
5. J. Rhodes
6. G. Samuels
7. Sarah Evans
8. Renée Spencer

In Social Psychology

1. L. Eby
2. Tammy D. Allen
3. Nicole Renick Thomson
4. Debra H. Zand
5. J. Rhodes
6. Renée Spencer
7. Sarah Evans
8. S. Lowe

In Speech and Hearing

1. Nicole Renick Thomson
2. Debra H. Zand
3. Renée Spencer
4. S. Lowe
5. G. Samuels
6. B. Liang
7. J. Rhodes
8. D. DuBois

Citations in the corpus

• An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. (2013, background): “Consistent with the youth mentoring literature, Ragins argued that high-quality relationships are further characterized by authenticity and empowerment (also see Spencer, 2006), which lead to increased self-worth, motivation, new skills, and the desire for greater connection.”
• A Reason, a Season, or a Lifetime: Relational Permanence Among Young Adults with Foster Care Backgrounds (2008, background): “Other research cautions, further, that not all mentoring or nonparental relationships young people experience with adults lead to the positive outcomes so often hoped for (Spencer, 2006).”
• Youth Mentoring and Resilience: Implications for Practice (2008, background): “underlying mentor attrition (Philip, 2003; Spencer, 2006) should be brought to bear”
• Mentoring relationships from early adolescence through emerging adulthood: A qualitative analysis (2008, background): “The handful of qualitative studies examining the nature of youth mentoring focus on formal programs rather than natural mentoring (Spencer, 2006) or tend to focus on youth as a whole rather than as separate developmental stages (Spencer, Jordan, & Sazama, 2004).”
• Mentees’ Perceptions of Their Interpersonal Relationships (2010, methodology): “One notable exception is the work of Spencer (2006) that focuses on specific processes that are likely contributors to higher quality mentoring relationships.”