Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure.

By W. Hofstee, Boele de Raad, L. R. Goldberg. 1992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

On the Social Nature of Personality: Effects of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Feedback about Collective Resource Use on Cooperation in a Resource Dilemma (2001, unknown): “The ExtraversionAgreeableness framework is part of a five-factor taxonomy that has gained considerable support in the field of personality (Hofstee et al., 1992; John, Angleitner, & Ostendorf, 1988; McCrae & John, 1992).”
Conflict and well-being at work: The moderating role of personality (2005, methodology): “The FFPI results from the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex Taxonomic Model of traits (Hofstee et al., 1992).”
Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. (2000, background): “It is interesting to note that the adjective descriptors from a 45° rotation of the circumplex approach to trait structure for three of the Big Five traits ( Hofstee, de Raad, & Goldberg, 1992 ) appear to closely correspond to the traits of transformational leaders: Extraversion-Agreeableness (frien”
A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions (2011, methodology): “High-Conscientious, high-Extraversion individuals are described as ambitious, serious, and purposeful (Hofstee et al., 1992; Johnson & Ostendorf, 1993), whereas low-Conscientious, high-Extraversion individuals are described as unruly, playful, and reckless.”
A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. (2004, methodology): “In order to systematically assess the domain of conscientiousness, we used the abridged Big Five dimensional circumplex (AB5C) model of personality traits (Hofstee et al., 1992).”