Power, consent and resistance: an autoethnography of competitive rowing

By L. Purdy, P. Potrac, Robyn L. Jones. 2008

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42975149da5fa9334d997a18c3ad4ddc564a5fb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. P. Potrac
2. Lee J. Nelson
3. R. Groom
4. C. Cushion
5. Robyn L. Jones
6. A. Sparkes
7. R. Sandford
8. K. Armour

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lee J. Nelson
2. R. Groom
3. C. Cushion
4. P. Potrac
5. R. Sandford
6. A. Sparkes
7. Robyn L. Jones
8. K. Armour

Citations in the corpus

• Coach Learning and Development: A Review of Literature (2010, background): “Power dynamics are an inherent underlying component of this social system and can manifest itself in competing egos and hidden hierarchical structures (Cushion, 2001; Cushion and Jones, 2006; Jones, Armour, and Potrac, 2002; Jones et al., 2004; Potrac et al., 2002; Purdy, Potrac, and Jones, 2008).”
• ‘Studentship’ and ‘impression management’ in an advanced soccer coach education award (2010, background): “It was thus hoped that the resultant data would serve to illuminate the multifaceted micro-level contested negotiations, which appear an inherent feature of coach education provision, thereby providing a far-reaching insight into its complex realities (Purdy et al., 2008).”
• Receiving video-based feedback in elite ice-hockey: a player's perspective (2014, methodology): “Importantly, then, such work (e.g. Jowett & Cockerill, 2003; Cushion & Jones, 2006; Purdy et al., 2008) has suggested that the interactions that occur between coach and athlete can have a significant impact upon athlete learning and the extent to which the two parties ‘connect, bond, and generally…”
• Ethnography and the senses: challenges and possibilities (2009, background): “…poetic representations and fictional representations (e.g. see Denison 1996, Denison and Reinhart 2000, Sparkes 2002a, 2002b, 2004, 2008, Denison and Markula 2003, Sparkes et al. 2003, Jones 2006, Sparkes and Douglas 2007, Allen Collinson 2008, Carless and Sparkes 2008, Purdy et al. 2008).”