Advancing the rationality debate

By K. Stanovich, R. F. West. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2000

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42261347a8fe3a88c8769d40280ee4c136051fb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

A Burden of Responsibility: The Role of Social Approval at the Onset of a Crisis (2014, background): “Research in social psychology has shown that evaluators engage in two types of cognitive processing tomake sense of the social world (Chaiken & Trope, 1999; Kahneman, 2011; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective (2010, unknown): “In the large individual differences programme of Keith Stanovich (1999, 2010; Stanovich & West, 2000) it has emerged that type differences are related to cognitive ability, whereas modes of thinking are related to personality and cognitive style measures, such as the extensively researched Need for…”
Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution (2012, background): “Different theorists give different names to these two systems (Evans & Over, 1996; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000), but all seem to agree that the two systems give rise to dual processing of information, with one Journal of Research in Science Teaching system (System 1) tending to provide…”
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition (2014, background): “…domain-general abilities and superior performance, as well as many compelling critiques of those theories (Baron, 1985; Kahneman, 2003, 2011; Reyna at al., 2009; Stanovich & West, 2000, 2008). and the breadth of information that comes to mind (Koriat, 2012; see also Pleskac & Busemeyer, 2010).”
Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test (2012, background): “Some research examines risky decisions in relation to individual differences in overall educational attainment, cognitive abilities, or cognitive styles (Frederick, 2005; Stanovich & West, 2000, 2008).”
Social Norms: A Review (2016, unknown): “This model extends research on dual process models that have identified two distinct modes of information processing: central and peripheral (Chaiken & Trope, 1999; Cosmides & Tooby, 2000; Shafir & LeBoeuf, 2002; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethics (2017, background): “…but fails to detect the error generated by System 1 (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982), and a third interpretation is that because System 2 is slower than System 1, System 2 detects the error but cannot intervene quickly enough to prevent the error being made (Gilbert, 1989; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making (2007, methodology): “The rational processes are effortful and logical, using a cost/benefit analysis to determine the best choice (Epstein, Pacini, Denes-Raj, & Heier, 1996; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002; Slovic, Finucane, Peters, & MacGregor, 2002; Stanovich & West, 2000 ).”
Tales from the Dark Side: Privacy Dark Strategies and Privacy Dark Patterns (2016, background): “This is an example of a System 1 thinking process; it takes place automatically, unconsciously, and with little effort [29, 43, 44].”