A Burden of Responsibility: The Role of Social Approval at the Onset of a Crisis
By Jonathan Bundy, Michael D. Pfarrer. 2014
371 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a24bb402cbf2ccfb97edea6ead2c2097e38b1270
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Sociology and Political Science
- Siri Terjesen
- William Q. Judge
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Rodolphe Durand
- Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
- Robert S. Nason
- Ioannis Ioannou
Citations in the corpus
- The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey (2020, background): “As firms must respond to public crises as quickly as possible (Bundy and Pfarrer 2015; Helmer and Hilhorst 2006; Williams 2012), it is highly valuable to examine how firms should respond to such crises (Cui et al. 2016; Geroski et al. 2010; Mayr et al. 2016; Thornhill and Amit 2003).”
- Corporate Governance Deviance (2016, positive): “These studies demonstrate the non-trivial role of national institutional logics, illustrating that organizations tend to adopt nationally-scripted practices and operate within an acceptable zone of conformity1 (Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015:353).”
- Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams (2017, background): “In a crisis, some leadership styles are considered more effective than others in helping organizations to respond (Ballesteros, Useem, & Wry, in press; Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015; Stam, Van Knippenberg, Wisse & Pieterse, 2016).”
- Willing and Able: A General Model of Organizational Responses to Normative Pressures (2017, background): “…more substantial costs, such as continuous penalties imposed by the regulatory authorities (Reid & Toffel, 2009) or costs in the form of a tarnished reputation (Zavyalova, Pfarrer, Reger, & Hubbard, 2016; Zavyalova et al., 2012) or the loss of the social license to operate (Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015).”
- A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, background): “…activity (Mishina et al., 2010), product recalls (Rhee & Haunschild, 2006; Zavyalova et al., 2012), boycotts (McDonnell & King, 2013), and crisis (Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015; Coombs & Holladay, 2004) has shed valuable insight into how firms respond to negative evaluations with a robust repertoire of…”
- Shame on Who? The Effects of Corporate Irresponsibility and Social Performance on Organizational Reputation (2019, neutral): “This is because firms vary in their level of social approval (Bundy and Pfarrer, 2015), where stakeholders may commend a firm's social performance or disapprove of that firm's behaviour, thus building either greater or reduced expectations around the firm's future conduct.”