A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis

By Stefan Ambec, Philippe Barla. 2002

344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4194b72bd038286443a87ea3468130e6d922d42b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview (2008, background): “Examples of such market failures include market power (Greaker, 2003; Simpson & Bradford, 1996), specific investments with contractual incompleteness (Ambec & Barla, 2005), asymmetric information within firms ( Ambec & Barla, 2002 ), and spillovers in knowledge (Ambec & Barla, 2005; Jaffe et al., 20”
Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India (2017, unknown): “First, our paper relates to the classic Porter’s hypothesis (Porter, 1991; Porter and Van der Linde, 1995) in various contexts, which finds mixed evidence for the same (Jaffe and Palmer, 1997; Ambec and Barla, 2002; Lanoie et al., 2011; Ambec et al., 2013).”
Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis (2011, unknown): “Alternatively, they may arise out of systemic organisational failures within the firm, such as contractual incompleteness (Ambec and Barla, 2005), asymmetric information (Ambec and Barla, 2002), and agency control problems (Gabel and Sinclair-Desgagné 2002).”
11 Postcards from the Edge (2007, background): “Given the lack of such systems, agents may even have an incentive to misreport both their activities and the cost of these activities ( Ambec & Barla, 2002 ).”
Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis (2005, background): “Ambec and Barla (2002) develop a principal-agent model with renegotiation to formalize the idea that ERs may overcome organizational inertia.7 In this model, a manager (agent) has private information about the outcome of an R&D investment.”
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010, unknown): “As emphasized by Ambec and Barla (2007), asymmetric information about environmental quality creates a “market-for-lemons” result where only “brown” (i.”
Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms (2010, background): “A firm chooses the net 2 Ambec and Barla (2002) construct a theoretical model that supports Porter and van der Linde’s (1995) suggestion that environmental regulation creates external pressure to overcome organizational inertia.”
Impact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector (2010, background): “In recent years, more formal theoretical formulations of the Porter hypothesis have been devised ( Ambec and Barla, 2002”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Entrenchment (2007, unknown): “6 This conjecture has been recently formalized in a mechanism design model by Ambec and Barla (2002) ,”
Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization (2012, background): “Email: mzzmsm@unife.it On the other hand, EIs have been argued to be important drivers of the competitiveness of firms (Porter & Van der Linde, 1995; Ambec & Barla, 2002, 2006; Wagner, 2006; Ambec et al., 2010; Porter, 2010).”
Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis (2006, methodology): “16 A tem used by Ambec and Barla (2002). 17 A term used by Palmer et al.”
Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence (2020, background): “Theoretical models (Kennedy, 1994; Simpson and Bradford, 1996; Xepapadeas and Zeeuw, 1999; Ambec and Barla, 2002; Greaker, 2003; Mohr, 2002; Feichtinger et al., 2005) and empirical evidence (Berman and Bui, 2001; Alpay et al.”