Impact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector

By Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, A. Black, Prithwiraj Nath, Luc Muyldermans. 2010

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12cbebb01bbc4759e6682d36eeb92151aab1d1c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan

In Marketing

1. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual
2. Abby Ghobadian
3. Carla Maria Marques Curado
4. A. Black
5. David Gallear
6. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
7. Jesús Galende

In Strategy and Management

1. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual
2. Abby Ghobadian
3. Carla Maria Marques Curado
4. A. Black
5. David Gallear
6. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
7. Jesús Galende
8. Peng Zhou

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis (2017, background): “Only a very few studies have sought to examine the relationship between these three constructs (regulations, innovation and performance) simultaneously (Eiadat et al., 2008; Lopez-Gamero et al., 2010; Montabon et al., 2007; Ramanathan et al., 2010; Triebswetter and Wackerbauer, 2008).”
• The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach (2019, background): “In addition, PRAC may directly affect sustainable PIP since it might require the application of more efficient methods of consumption and waste recycling, and a consequence of such methods is a reduction in the total amount of the company’s operational costs [42].”