Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis

992 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries (2012, positive): “Actually, there is a possible positive long-run effect if including lagged PACE value (Lanoie et al., 2008). Focusing on polluting industries, the Los Angeles case studied by Berman and Bui (2001) show that despite a higher abatement cost brought about by stricter environmental regulations, the poll”
Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India (2017, positive): “First, our paper relates to the classic Porter’s hypothesis (Porter, 1991; Porter and Van der Linde, 1995) in various contexts, which finds mixed evidence for the same (Jaffe and Palmer, 1997; Ambec and Barla, 2002; Lanoie et al., 2011; Ambec et al., 2013).”
Environmental performance, innovation and spillovers. Evidence from a regional NAMEA (2013, positive): “2 Induced innovation effects have been strongly linked to the origin and development of the Porter hypothesis (Lanoie et al., 2011; Porter and van der Linde, 1995).”
Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts (2012, background): “Indeed, work undertaken based on survey data finds that perceived environmental policy stringency has a positive effect on innovation, but a negative impact on commercial performance (Lanoie et al., 2011).”