Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location

By Paul Bertelson, Gisa Aschersleben. 1998

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Indeed, back in the psychophysics laboratory, one tends to see partial capture, with the sound being moved just a few degrees toward the perceived location of the simultaneously presented visual stimulus (e.g., see Jackson, 1953; Bertelson and Aschersleben, 1998; Alais and Burr, 2004).”
Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the “unity assumption” using audiovisual speech stimuli (2007, background): “... whereas several empirical studies have been taken to provide support for the “unity assumption” in the domain of spatial ventriloquism (Jack & Thurlow, 1973; Jackson, 1953; Warren et al., 1981; but see also Radeau & Bertelson, 1977, for evidence that the “realism” of the stimuli used has no effe”
Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review (2013, background): “The initial evidence about the role of attention suggested that spatial ventriloquism is largely an automatic phenomenon (e.g., Alais & Burr, 2004a; Bertelson & Aschersleben, 1998; Bertelson, Pavani, Ladavas, Vroomen & de Gelder, 2000a; Bertelson, Vroomen, de Gelder & Driver, 2000b; Bonath,…”
Unifying multisensory signals across time and space (2004, unknown): “However, a number of cross-modal illusions illustrate that this distinction is not absolute, in that multisensory cues that are somewhat discordant can give rise to a unitary perception (Bertelson and Aschersleben 1998; Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Choe et al. 1975; Hairston et al. 2003; Jack and Thur”
‘When Birds of a Feather Flock Together’: Synesthetic Correspondences Modulate Audiovisual Integration in Non-Synesthetes (2009, background): “When spatiotemporally conflicting stimuli from different modalities are integrated, small conflicts are often compensated for, giving rise to the ventriloquist effect, whereby the conflicting stimuli are perceptually ‘‘pulled’’ together toward a single spatiotemporal onset [14–17].”
Audio-visual simultaneity judgments (2005, background): “Bertelson and Aschersleben (1998) argued that participants in previous spatial ventriloquism studies might have responded that auditory and visual stimuli came from the same location not because this is necessarily what they perceived, but instead because it is what they assumed AUDIO–VISUAL SIMULT”
When vision ‘extinguishes’ touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect (2008, background): “For example, it has been shown that vision can dominate over audition in localization judgments (Bertelson and Aschersleben 1998; Pick et al. 1969), over touch for shape judgments (Gibson 1943; Spence 2008), and over proprioception when trying to determine the position of one’s limbs in space (e.”
Perceptual congruency of audio-visual speech affects ventriloquism with bilateral visual stimuli (2011, background): “This effect has also been demonstrated with non-associative stimuli such as a simple flash and a synchronized burst of noise ( Bertelson & Aschersleben, 1998 ).”
Auditory and visual objects. (2001, background): “Bertelson and Aschersleben (1998) asked observers to judge whether the source of a sound was to the left or right of the median sagittal plane.”
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review (2010, unknown): “…large temporal window of integration, inasmuch as intervals ranged from 250 msec before visual coincidence to 150 msec after coincidence (see also Bertelson & Aschersleben, 1998, for the effect of temporal asynchrony on spatial ventriloquism, or Shams, Kamitani, & Shimojo, 2002, for the…”
Synesthetic congruency modulates the temporal ventriloquism effect. (2008, unknown): “, [1,4]; see also [8]).”