Synesthetic congruency modulates the temporal ventriloquism effect.

By Cesare V. Parise, Charles Spence. 2008

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Vatakis and Spence (2007) suggested that the presentation of the matched speech stimuli may have resulted in more temporal ventriloquism (e.g., Morein-Zamir et al., 2003) than was the case for the mismatched stimuli (see also Parise and Spence, 2008; though see Keetels and Vroomen, 2011).”
Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? (2012, background): “…be explained in terms of decision- or response-related mechanisms, Parise and Spence’s (2009) results seem to reflect the tendency of our cognitive systems to integrate crossmodally congruent stimuli at a perceptual level (see also Bien, ten Oever, Goebel, & Sack, 2012; Parise & Spence, 2008).”
‘When Birds of a Feather Flock Together’: Synesthetic Correspondences Modulate Audiovisual Integration in Non-Synesthetes (2009, result): “It should be noted, however, that the synesthetic associations studied here (as well as in many other studies, see [1–3,5,7–10,13]) are likely relative rather than absolute, depending on the particular range of stimuli used.”
No effect of synesthetic congruency on temporal ventriloquism (2010, methodology): “The other group of participants received no training at all, as in the study by Parise and Spence (2008).”
The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect (2015, background): “…the magnitude of the Colavita effect because synesthetic congruency has been shown to affect other manifestations of audiovisual integration (Parise and Spence 2008, 2009; Bien et al. 2012), while at the same time the Colavita effect is sensitive to (structural) factors that are critical…”
Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review (2013, background): “…with size/brightness in the visual dimension (Evans & Treisman, 2010; Gallace & Spence, 2006; GuzmanMartinez, Ortega, Grabowecky, Mossbridge & Suzuki, 2012; Makovac & Gerbino, 2010; Parise & Spence, 2008, 2009, 2012; Spence, 2011; Sweeny, Guzman-Martinez, Ortega, Grabowecky & Suzuki, 2012).”
Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time. (2009, background): “Another class of such studies is termed the temporal ventriloquism effect (e.g. Vroomen et al., 2004; Freeman and Driver, 2008; Parise and Spence, 2008; Getzmann, 2007; see Spence, in this volume).”