Auditory and visual objects.

By Michael Kubovy, D. V. Valkenburg. 2001

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “…assumption certainly serves as one of the key 1Instead of simply using the term “object,” which may implicitly refer to a concrete material thing (see Kubovy and van Valkenburg, 2001), the term “event” is used here in order to emphasize the temporal property that is typically associated with…”
Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing. (2005, background): “Here we show that task-irrelevant auditory objects may affect the deployment of visual attention, providing evidence that crossmodal links can also occur at an object-based level.”
Reading with sounds: sensory substitution selectively activates the visual word form area in the blind. (2012, background): “…unlikely that any specific low-level sensory shape processing mimicking vision drives the activation or selectivity observed in our results, since the physical dimensions on which it is based differ greatly from those characterizing both visual and tactile letters (Kubovy and Van Valkenburg, 2001).”
A Boolean map theory of visual attention. (2007, background): “…one can be perfectly aware of an auditory event such as a bird singing while having only a vague sense of its location (see Kubovy, 1981, 1988, and Kubovy & Van Valkenburg, 2001, for converging evidence that location is unique in vision, but not audition, and for stimulating discussion of this…”