Audio-visual simultaneity judgments

By M. Zampini, S. Guest, D. Shore, Charles Spence. 2005

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “8This feature is consistent with the fact that the window in which audiovisual simultaneity is perceived is typically wider when vision leads than when audition leads (Zampini et al., 2005).”
Music expertise shapes audiovisual temporal integration windows for speech, sinewave speech, and music (2014, background): “…and piano music stimuli at 13 audiovisual stimulus onset asynchronies (±360, ±300 ±240, ±180, ±120, ±60, and 0 ms) (Dixon and Spitz, 1980; Alais and Burr, 2003; Grant et al., 2004; Zampini et al., 2005; Vatakis and Spence, 2006a,b, 2007, 2008a,b; van Wassenhove et al., 2007; Love et al., 2013).”
Perceptual training narrows the temporal window of multisensory binding (2009, result): “…the positive side of the distribution) are very much in accord with those reported in previous work (Dixon and Spitz, 1980; Bushara et al., 2001; Zampini et al., 2003, 2005a,b; Colonius and Diederich, 2004; Fujisaki et al., 2004), making the training effects reported here even more striking in…”
Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli (2007, background): “It was also shown that the spatial discrepancy modulates the perception of simultaneity or time resolution of the audiovisual stimuli (Bertelson & Aschersleben, 2003; Lewald & Guski, 2003; Zampini et al., 2005).”
Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect (2008, background): “Indeed, an extensive body of research has highlighted the fact that structural factors such as the spatial and temporal coincidence of auditory and visual events can modulate audiovisual integration (see Calvert et al. 2004; Slutsky and Recanzone 2001; Spence 2007; Stein and Meredith 1993; Wallace e”
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review (2010, unknown): “…stimuli, such as auditory beeps and visual flashes, JNDs have been reported on the order of approximately 25–50 msec (Keetels & Vroomen, 2005; Zampini, Guest, et al., 2005; Zampini et al., 2003a), but for audio–tactile pairs, Zampini, Brown, et al. (2005) obtained JNDs of about 80 msec, and…”
Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance (2012, unknown): “In addition, this temporal ‘‘principle’’ has been shown across stimulus types ranging from the very simple to the complex (i.e., speech—Conrey and Pisoni 2006; Hirsh and Sherrick 1961; Keetels and Vroomen 2005; Miller and D’Esposito 2005; Stevenson et al. 2010; van Atteveldt et al. 2007; van Wassenh”
Multisensory temporal integration: Task and stimulus dependencies (2013, unknown): “A great deal of work has focused on the importance of temporal factors in dictating multisensory interactions and has shown robust effects of stimulus timing at the level of single neurons (Meredith et al. 1987, 1992; Royal et al. 2009), neural populations measured by EEG (Senkowski et al. 2007; Sch”