Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995–2000

By R. Lance Holbert, Michael T. Stephenson, Stephenson, Robert M. Hauser, R. H. Hoyle. 2002

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40ec3e20e1048eea1c33937d3f72c052815166f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Further Evidence That Psychological Reactance Can Be Modeled as a Combination of Anger and Negative Cognitions (2007, methodology): “However, anger and ad persuasiveness were assessed with multiple items and therefore treated as latent composite variables (see Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach (2010, background): “Holbert and Stephenson (2003) explain that the product of coefficients procedure converts parameter estimates of each path in the proposed mediated relationship into a standardized z-score and then computes the product of the two zscores that constitute the mediated effect.”
Connecting Interpersonal and Mass Communication: Science News Exposure, Perceived Ability to Understand Science, and Conversation (2006, methodology): “Following Holbert and Stephenson (2002), we report whether the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is less than the recommended cutoff point of .06 as an indicator of fit.”
Statistical and Practical Concerns With Published Communication Research Featuring Structural Equation Modeling (2017, background): “Holbert and Stephenson (2002) reported an average of 33.38 degrees of freedom in their review of SEM studies published in communication journals.”
The Importance of Indirect Effects in Media Effects Research: Testing for Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling (2003, background): “OO - . l l ) , Comparative Fit Index = .95 (Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
The Health Belief Model as an Explanatory Framework in Communication Research: Exploring Parallel, Serial, and Moderated Mediation (2014, background): “Validating an optimal model and / or models for the HBM will require numerous replications across a variety of contexts (Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
Helpful or Harmful? How Frequent Repetition Affects Perceived Statement Credibility (2013, methodology): “The model presented in figure 2 reveals an acceptable overall model fit (Holbert & Stephenson, 2002; Hu & Bentler, 1999): χ² = 72.95, df = 50, p = .02; SRMR = .08; RMSEA = .05; CFI = .98.”
Cognitive and emotional dimensions of perceived risk characteristics, genre-specific media effects, and risk perceptions: the case of H1N1 influenza in South Korea (2015, background): “…these indexes were designed to avoid some of the problems of sample size and distributional misspecification associated with the conventional overall test of fit (the χ2 statistic; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 1998; also for using SEM in communication research, see Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
Environmental Concern, Patterns of Television Viewing, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Integrating Models of Media Consumption and Effects (2003, background): “This i s an important set of effects that detail Holbert, Kwak, & ShahlENVlRONMENT AND TELEVISION 191 an additional role played by factual-based television use beyond the study of direct effects (Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
Avoidance among adolescents in conversations about their parents’ relationship: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management (2009, methodology): “In addition to reporting the chi-square, we set a priori guidelines that the models should exceed .95 for the Comparative Fit index (CFI) and be lower than .08 for the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) (see Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Tourism Research (2013, background): “This finding is more favorable than that of Holbert and Stephenson (2002), who reported that only 54% of SEM-based articles in communication sciences contained a visual illustration of the model.”
Risk Information Seeking Among U.S. and Dutch Residents (2009, background): “However, it is of the utmost importance for scholars to seek to ensure the validity of their models via cross-validation (Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”
The Reactance Restoration Scale (RRS): A Measure of Direct and Indirect Restoration (2007, methodology): “A large sample size often results in an oversensitive chi-square test; hence, the measurement model fit the exercise data well following established conventions (see Holbert & Stephenson, 2002).”