The Reactance Restoration Scale (RRS): A Measure of Direct and Indirect Restoration

By Brian L. Quick, Michael T. Stephenson. 2007

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b565fd60cac8ef176653dbe2a7da9f4e7e0feaf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Brian L. Quick
2. D. Johnson
3. Michael T. Stephenson
4. Tobias Reynolds-Tylus

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Johnson
2. Michael T. Stephenson
3. Brian L. Quick

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Johnson
2. Michael T. Stephenson
3. Brian L. Quick

Citations in the corpus

• Connected Classroom Climate: A Validity Study (2009, result): “38) are of similar magnitude as correlations cited as evidence of construct validity in other studies (eg, Quick & Stephenson, 2007 ; Shearman & Levine, 2006 ).”
• Examining the Role of Trait Reactance and Sensation Seeking on Perceived Threat, State Reactance, and Reactance Restoration (2008, methodology): “…behavioral intentions in opposition of the message (Buller, Borland, & Burgoon, 1998), poor message evaluations (Grandpre et al., 2003; Quick & Considine, in press; Quick & Stephenson, 2007a), and derogate the freedom-threatening source (Burgoon, Alvaro, Broneck, et al., 2002; Miller et al., 2007).”