Helpful or Harmful? How Frequent Repetition Affects Perceived Statement Credibility

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When Debunking Scientific Myths Fails (and When It Does Not) (2016, background): “This phenomenon is known as the truth effect (e.g., Arkes et al., 1989; Bacon, 1979; Begg, Anas, & Farinacci, 1992; Boehm, 1994; Gigerenzer, 1984; Hasher et al., 1977; Koch & Zerback, 2013; a meta-analysis by Dechêne, Stahl, Hansen, & Wänke, 2010, confirms the stability of this effect).”
Message fatigue: Conceptual definition, operationalization, and correlates (2017, background): “In exploring possible causes of the observed inverted-U shape relationships, Koch and Zerback (2013) found that perceived persuasive intent decreased the overall positive effects of exposure frequency on message effects.”
Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages (2016, methodology): “In this way, we can derive the following two hypotheses from reactance research (Jenkins & Dragojevic, 2011; Koch & Zerback, 2013).”
The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis (2016, background): “These studies should also look for a possible suppression effect (Koch and Zerback 2013).”