Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation

By J. Adie, J. Duda, Nikos Ntoumanis. 2012

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Objectives: Drawing from the basic needs theory [BNT; Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3e33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press], the major purpose of the present study was to test a hypothesized sequence of temporal relationships between perceptions of coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and indices of well- and ill-being. A subsidiary aim was to ascertain the assumed mediational role of basic need satisfaction in explicating the perceived autonomy support and well-/ill-being relationships over time. Design: A field-based longitudinal design was employed. Methods: Participants (N ¼54 males) from an elite youth soccer academy in the UK completed a multisection questionnaire tapping the targeted variables on six occasions across two competitive seasons. Results: Multi-level regression analyses revealed that perceptions of coach-autonomy support positively predicted within-person changes and between-person mean differences in basic need satisfaction and well-being over time. Satisfaction scores for the needs for competence and relatedness were found to predict within-person changes in subjective vitality. These same needs partially mediated the coachautonomy supportesubjective vitality link over the two seasons. Conclusions: The findings partially support the tenets of BNT, and are discussed in terms of their practical application to participants involved in an elite youth sport setting.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40e9fe451d1065a2737528d0f50e14f88c1b3cbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Nikos Ntoumanis
  2. J. Reeve
  3. J. Duda
  4. Richard M. Ryan
  5. E. Quested
  6. Kimberley J. Bartholomew
  7. Clifford J. Mallett
  8. Joseph Occhino

In Safety Research

  1. Nikos Ntoumanis
  2. J. Reeve
  3. J. Duda
  4. Richard M. Ryan
  5. P. Sarrazin
  6. Maarten Vansteenkiste
  7. Kimberley J. Bartholomew
  8. S. Cheon

In Social Psychology

  1. Nikos Ntoumanis
  2. J. Reeve
  3. J. Duda
  4. Richard M. Ryan
  5. M. Standage
  6. P. Sarrazin
  7. Maarten Vansteenkiste
  8. S. Cheon

Citations in the corpus