What Chimpanzees Know about Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture (2010, methodology): “Variations of this method involve other kinds of communicative cues (Call and Tomasello 2005) and a trained chimpanzee instead of a human as the provider of the cue (Itakura et al. 1999).”
Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition (2005, background): “…they send it as when they receive it).6 There are also a number of experimental studies demonstrating that apes are not able to understand communicative intentions as manifest in such acts as pointing or placing a marker to indicate the location of food (for a review, see Call & Tomasello, 2005).”
Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human's perspective (2009, background): “In about a dozen different studies, from several different laboratories, chimpanzees and other ape individuals without training are very seldom above chance in using any of these social cues to find hidden food (Call & Tomasello, 2005).”
Symposium on S. Butterfill and I. Apperly, "How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind" (2013, methodology): “For an application of this principle, consider Hare, Call and Tomasello’s (2001) experiment again.”
Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? (2009, background): “, Call & Tomasello , 2005 ; Emery & Clayton , 2001 , 2007 ) .”