Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach
By L. K. Bartholomew, G. Parcel, Gerjo Kok, N. Gottlieb, H. Schaalma, C. Markham, Shellie Tyrrell, Ross Shegog, Maria E. Fernandez, P. Mullen and 3 more. 2006
2,998 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40a7b0693b4be8d4b9053957903fceb6406b6dba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. De Vos
- Tommy Gärling
- M. Friman
- Satoshi Fujii
- Allen C. Johnston
- C. Abraham
- S. Bamberg
- Merrill Warkentin
Citations in the corpus
- Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory (2013, methodology): “This taxonomy was preceded by Intervention Mapping, which also contains a taxonomy (IM; Bartholomew, Parcel, & Kok, 1998; Bartholomew et al., 2011).”
- Antimicrobial stewardship. (2012, unknown): “To select a strategy that matches the prevailing determinants, several methods and tools can be used, varying from very theoretical approaches, such as intervention mapping, to more pragmatic approaches 90,92-94 .”
- An Enhanced Fear Appeal Rhetorical Framework: Leveraging Threats to the Human Asset Through Sanctioning Rhetoric (2015, background): “Initially applied almost exclusively within the healthcare domain, early fear-inducing messages concerned health or safetyrelated threats (Bartholomew et al. 2011; Milne et al. 2006) to the physical self, such as injury caused by not wearing a seat belt or cancer caused by overexposure to the sun or”
- From normative influence to social pressure: how relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying (2016, background): “Therefore, interventions could encourage parents to provide their children with informational, emotional, appraisal, and instrumental support (Bartholomew et al., 2011) to help them act appropriately online, especially when being confronted with cyberbullying as a bystander.”
- Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011, background): “Therefore, a planned approach to intervention design is recommended, such as “intervention mapping”,[65] or other systematic intervention development processes[66] which select intervention techniques to address targeted behaviour change processes (and that are tailored for the target population and”
- Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions (2014, background): “In addition, several authors relate normative beliefs to social pressure, which is described as a more directly experienced social influence (Bartholomew et al., 2011).”
- Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions (2019, background): “Systematic approaches to identifying determinants and matching strategies to address them have been developed [9, 20, 35, 39].”
- Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research (2013, background): “Such evaluation studies should be initiated from the very inception of an intervention and in collaboration with target populations and relevant stakeholders (Bartholomew et al., 2011; Bos et al., 2008).”
- A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008, background): “This would clarify links between inclusion of techniques and theory-specified change processes, links that are not always clear in published intervention descriptions at present (Bartholomew et al., 2006; Michie & Abraham, 2004).”
- Systematic Review of Studies on Compliance with Hand Hygiene Guidelines in Hospital Care (2010, unknown): “20 % –3 0% [2 5, 38 , 44 –4 6, 48 , 67 ] 7 (1 7) [2 9, 40 , 48 , 85 , 97 , 10 3– 10 5] 8 (1 8) [6 3, 85 , 10 3] 3 (7 ) [2 2, 24 , 37 , 41 , 47 , 54 , 65 , 84 ,”